Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The case pertains to granting bail in a money laundering case involving scheduled offenses under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The key points are: the applicability of Section 436A of the CrPC, which limits the maximum detention period for an undertrial prisoner, to offenses under PMLA, considering the twin conditions of Section 45 of PMLA. The Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case held that Section 436A of CrPC will prevail over the rigors of Section 45 of PMLA, allowing relaxation of the twin conditions in case of Article 21 violation. In the present case, the applicant has been incarcerated for around 4 years and 8 months, exceeding half the maximum punishment u/s 4 of PMLA. Considering the long incarceration, the High Court granted bail to the applicant, subject to conditions.
The case pertains to granting bail in a money laundering case involving scheduled offenses under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The key points are: the applicability of Section 436A of the CrPC, which limits the maximum detention period for an undertrial prisoner, to offenses under PMLA, considering the twin conditions of Section 45 of PMLA. The Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case held that Section 436A of CrPC will prevail over the rigors of Section 45 of PMLA, allowing relaxation of the twin conditions in case of Article 21 violation. In the present case, the applicant has been incarcerated for around 4 years and 8 months, exceeding half the maximum punishment u/s 4 of PMLA. Considering the long incarceration, the High Court granted bail to the applicant, subject to conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
