Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Mobile-phone electronic evidence failed to establish customs undervaluation, while duty survived on non-authentic origin certificates without importer...
This circular clarifies the regularization of refund of IGST availed in contravention of rule 96(10) of the WBGST Rules, 2017, where exporters had initially imported inputs without paying integrated taxes and compensation cess by availing benefits under certain notifications, but subsequently paid the IGST, compensation cess, and interest on such imported inputs. It states that if the Bill of Entry for import is reassessed by Customs authorities to reflect the payment of IGST and compensation cess, the refund of IGST paid on exports shall not be considered in contravention of rule 96(10). The circular provides a retrospective clarification on the applicability of the Explanation inserted in rule 96(10) through a notification, allowing regularization of such refunds by subsequent payment of taxes and reassessment.
This circular clarifies the regularization of refund of IGST availed in contravention of rule 96(10) of the WBGST Rules, 2017, where exporters had initially imported inputs without paying integrated taxes and compensation cess by availing benefits under certain notifications, but subsequently paid the IGST, compensation cess, and interest on such imported inputs. It states that if the Bill of Entry for import is reassessed by Customs authorities to reflect the payment of IGST and compensation cess, the refund of IGST paid on exports shall not be considered in contravention of rule 96(10). The circular provides a retrospective clarification on the applicability of the Explanation inserted in rule 96(10) through a notification, allowing regularization of such refunds by subsequent payment of taxes and reassessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4902 
