Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Blocking of a supplier's credit ledger by mentioning 'Registration of supplier has been cancelled' without issuing a show cause notice violates principles of natural justice. Section 74 statutorily recognizes and mandates adherence to natural justice principles, while Rule 86A is silent on this aspect. Implementing Rule 86A without following natural justice may cause hardship and injustice, contrary to the lawmakers' intent. The Calcutta High Court's judgment in Basanta Kumar Shaw did not address whether natural justice principles apply to Rule 86A. Input Tax Credit is a concession, not a vested right, but natural justice principles must be read into Rule 86A. Blocking the petitioners' electronic credit ledger without following natural justice and assigning adequate reasons cannot sustain judicial scrutiny. The impugned action is set aside, and the petition is allowed.
Blocking of a supplier's credit ledger by mentioning 'Registration of supplier has been cancelled' without issuing a show cause notice violates principles of natural justice. Section 74 statutorily recognizes and mandates adherence to natural justice principles, while Rule 86A is silent on this aspect. Implementing Rule 86A without following natural justice may cause hardship and injustice, contrary to the lawmakers' intent. The Calcutta High Court's judgment in Basanta Kumar Shaw did not address whether natural justice principles apply to Rule 86A. Input Tax Credit is a concession, not a vested right, but natural justice principles must be read into Rule 86A. Blocking the petitioners' electronic credit ledger without following natural justice and assigning adequate reasons cannot sustain judicial scrutiny. The impugned action is set aside, and the petition is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.