Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Capital gains exemption u/s 54F denied due to non-completion of construction within the stipulated period. The assessee entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA), receiving a residential villa in exchange for a plot of land. Despite a delay of over 7 years in completing construction against the 3-year period u/s 54F, the assessee failed to substantiate the explanation of a dispute among partners. No evidence was provided to demonstrate efforts made by the assessee to enforce rights under the agreement or ensure timely completion. Lack of vigilance and failure to exercise due diligence resulted in the dismissal of appeals by the Appellate Tribunal.
Capital gains exemption u/s 54F denied due to non-completion of construction within the stipulated period. The assessee entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA), receiving a residential villa in exchange for a plot of land. Despite a delay of over 7 years in completing construction against the 3-year period u/s 54F, the assessee failed to substantiate the explanation of a dispute among partners. No evidence was provided to demonstrate efforts made by the assessee to enforce rights under the agreement or ensure timely completion. Lack of vigilance and failure to exercise due diligence resulted in the dismissal of appeals by the Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
