Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Inadvertence claim untenable, delay in rectifying alleged error reflects absence of inadvertence. Petitioner withdrew higher value complaint, pursued lower value complaint, then approached mediation without realizing inadvertence. Petitioner revived execution petition for arbitral award recovery instead of complaint cases, indicating deliberate choice. Application u/s 362 CrPC for recall filed belatedly after six months, dismissed by magistrate. Conduct inconsistent with inadvertence claim. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
Inadvertence claim untenable, delay in rectifying alleged error reflects absence of inadvertence. Petitioner withdrew higher value complaint, pursued lower value complaint, then approached mediation without realizing inadvertence. Petitioner revived execution petition for arbitral award recovery instead of complaint cases, indicating deliberate choice. Application u/s 362 CrPC for recall filed belatedly after six months, dismissed by magistrate. Conduct inconsistent with inadvertence claim. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.