Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The court held that once a Magistrate takes cognizance and issues process against the accused, there is no provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure to allow the Magistrate to drop the proceedings at the behest of the accused. The revisional court's finding that the trial court wrongly dismissed the application for dropping proceedings was contrary to law. Regarding dishonor of a cheque due to 'account frozen', the court ruled that the complaint u/s 138 of the Act is maintainable even if the cheque is dishonored for this reason. The onus is on the accused to prove they were unaware of the account freeze, the freeze was beyond their control, and the account had sufficient balance when the cheque was issued. The revisional court's order was set aside, the trial court's order was restored, and the matter was remanded for a full-fledged trial.
The court held that once a Magistrate takes cognizance and issues process against the accused, there is no provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure to allow the Magistrate to drop the proceedings at the behest of the accused. The revisional court's finding that the trial court wrongly dismissed the application for dropping proceedings was contrary to law. Regarding dishonor of a cheque due to 'account frozen', the court ruled that the complaint u/s 138 of the Act is maintainable even if the cheque is dishonored for this reason. The onus is on the accused to prove they were unaware of the account freeze, the freeze was beyond their control, and the account had sufficient balance when the cheque was issued. The revisional court's order was set aside, the trial court's order was restored, and the matter was remanded for a full-fledged trial.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
