Income-tax prosecution fails when appellate remand removes its factual foundation; directors require company arraignment for vicarious criminal liabil...
Capital character of assignment consideration prevents taxation as residuary income, while unsupported interest-related expenditure remains non-deduct...
Make-available condition shields regional support-service receipts from Indian taxation where no independent capability or permanent establishment exi...
Transfer-pricing treatment of corporate guarantees and convertible loans followed prior-year consistency, with taxable foreign dividends excluded from...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Medical relief status protects government-contracted mobile healthcare from commercial classification, while provisional registration cancellation req...
Charitable registration cancellation requires proof that educational activities abandoned their objects; incidental receipts and retained surplus are ...
Appellant booked artificial short-term capital loss by purchasing shares from group entities at exorbitant rates and selling same shares to other group entities at lower rates to offset huge capital gains. Transaction lacked genuineness, designed solely to avoid taxes. Cost of purchase rightly recomputed by authorities at Rs.33 per share. Interest expenditure disallowed u/s 14A as appellant failed to substantiate investments were for strategic business purposes, admitted using interest-bearing funds for non-business investments yielding exempt income. CIT(A)'s order upheld, assessee's appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Appellant booked artificial short-term capital loss by purchasing shares from group entities at exorbitant rates and selling same shares to other group entities at lower rates to offset huge capital gains. Transaction lacked genuineness, designed solely to avoid taxes. Cost of purchase rightly recomputed by authorities at Rs.33 per share. Interest expenditure disallowed u/s 14A as appellant failed to substantiate investments were for strategic business purposes, admitted using interest-bearing funds for non-business investments yielding exempt income. CIT(A)'s order upheld, assessee's appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.