Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Appellant booked artificial short-term capital loss by purchasing shares from group entities at exorbitant rates and selling same shares to other group entities at lower rates to offset huge capital gains. Transaction lacked genuineness, designed solely to avoid taxes. Cost of purchase rightly recomputed by authorities at Rs.33 per share. Interest expenditure disallowed u/s 14A as appellant failed to substantiate investments were for strategic business purposes, admitted using interest-bearing funds for non-business investments yielding exempt income. CIT(A)'s order upheld, assessee's appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Appellant booked artificial short-term capital loss by purchasing shares from group entities at exorbitant rates and selling same shares to other group entities at lower rates to offset huge capital gains. Transaction lacked genuineness, designed solely to avoid taxes. Cost of purchase rightly recomputed by authorities at Rs.33 per share. Interest expenditure disallowed u/s 14A as appellant failed to substantiate investments were for strategic business purposes, admitted using interest-bearing funds for non-business investments yielding exempt income. CIT(A)'s order upheld, assessee's appeal dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.