Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Assessee maintained separate books of accounts and furnished audited financial statements for each eligible infrastructure project, fulfilling conditions for deduction u/s 80IA. CIT(A) rightly allowed deduction, following precedent. Unverified credit balances cannot be added as payments were made through cheques and reflected in books. Ad hoc disallowances of expenses and wages deleted by CIT(A) based on Tribunal decisions. TDS u/s 194H not deducted on petty commission payments below Rs. 5,000, rightly deleted by CIT(A). Assessee opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, paid identified tax, eligible for refund. Cross-objection withdrawn with liberty to restore if dispute not settled under scheme. No interference warranted in CIT(A)'s well-reasoned order.
Assessee maintained separate books of accounts and furnished audited financial statements for each eligible infrastructure project, fulfilling conditions for deduction u/s 80IA. CIT(A) rightly allowed deduction, following precedent. Unverified credit balances cannot be added as payments were made through cheques and reflected in books. Ad hoc disallowances of expenses and wages deleted by CIT(A) based on Tribunal decisions. TDS u/s 194H not deducted on petty commission payments below Rs. 5,000, rightly deleted by CIT(A). Assessee opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, paid identified tax, eligible for refund. Cross-objection withdrawn with liberty to restore if dispute not settled under scheme. No interference warranted in CIT(A)'s well-reasoned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.