Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Assessee arrived at business income after setting off losses. Assessee's entitlement to carry forward losses was revised due to application of Section 79. Case was reopened u/s 147 after obtaining approval u/s 148, citing revision of assessee's entitlement to carry forward losses due to Section 79 application. Claims were examined during original assessment proceedings, and no error prejudicial to Revenue's interests was found. Inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer regarding certain claims does not warrant invoking Section 263 powers. Revenue failed to establish that Commissioner exercised power in accordance with law. Facts do not fulfill twin conditions of Section 263. Decided in favor of assessee.
Assessee arrived at business income after setting off losses. Assessee's entitlement to carry forward losses was revised due to application of Section 79. Case was reopened u/s 147 after obtaining approval u/s 148, citing revision of assessee's entitlement to carry forward losses due to Section 79 application. Claims were examined during original assessment proceedings, and no error prejudicial to Revenue's interests was found. Inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer regarding certain claims does not warrant invoking Section 263 powers. Revenue failed to establish that Commissioner exercised power in accordance with law. Facts do not fulfill twin conditions of Section 263. Decided in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
