Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated. Applicant alleged transactions worth Rs. 3.87 crores as preferential or fraudulent, seeking recovery from respondents. Tribunal unable to classify Rs. 3.87 crore transactions due to lack of information. One vehicle transferred post-CIRP initiation treated as fraudulent transaction. u/s 66(2)(b) IBC, respondents directed to contribute Rs. 13,74,585 to Corporate Debtor's assets for failure to exercise due diligence in minimizing potential loss to creditors. Application partly allowed.
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated. Applicant alleged transactions worth Rs. 3.87 crores as preferential or fraudulent, seeking recovery from respondents. Tribunal unable to classify Rs. 3.87 crore transactions due to lack of information. One vehicle transferred post-CIRP initiation treated as fraudulent transaction. u/s 66(2)(b) IBC, respondents directed to contribute Rs. 13,74,585 to Corporate Debtor's assets for failure to exercise due diligence in minimizing potential loss to creditors. Application partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.