Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Money laundering case involving public funds looted through apps promising high returns. Petitioner argued trial court failed to consider evidence, violated natural justice principles. Court held bail order only prima facie view, not final decision. Strictly construed money laundering offence ingredients per Supreme Court precedent. Probative value of PMLA statement to be considered at trial stage. Bail cannot be denied merely assuming recovered property is proceeds of crime. WhatsApp chats indicating fund transfers not sufficient to cancel bail at this stage. ED's apprehensions about derailing investigation or flight risk mere apprehensions without substantial reasons. More stringent conditions can be imposed if needed. Transactions claimed as genuine business dealings, proceeds of crime already deposited. Frequent fund rotations disproportionate to business, PMLA statement authenticity to be examined at trial. Investigation completed, complaint filed, no material to cancel bail. Bail granted on relevant considerations. Petition dismissed.
Money laundering case involving public funds looted through apps promising high returns. Petitioner argued trial court failed to consider evidence, violated natural justice principles. Court held bail order only prima facie view, not final decision. Strictly construed money laundering offence ingredients per Supreme Court precedent. Probative value of PMLA statement to be considered at trial stage. Bail cannot be denied merely assuming recovered property is proceeds of crime. WhatsApp chats indicating fund transfers not sufficient to cancel bail at this stage. ED's apprehensions about derailing investigation or flight risk mere apprehensions without substantial reasons. More stringent conditions can be imposed if needed. Transactions claimed as genuine business dealings, proceeds of crime already deposited. Frequent fund rotations disproportionate to business, PMLA statement authenticity to be examined at trial. Investigation completed, complaint filed, no material to cancel bail. Bail granted on relevant considerations. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
