Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Arrest order challenged u/s 19(3) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. Court held PMLA prevails as special enactment over general law. Section 65 allows application of Criminal Procedure Code provisions not inconsistent with PMLA for arrest, investigation, etc. Respondents followed PMLA procedures for arrest, no infirmity found. If person already in judicial custody for one case, can be formally arrested for subsequent case investigation. Section 19(3) PMLA requirements complied with, no violation. Petition dismissed as devoid of merits.
Arrest order challenged u/s 19(3) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. Court held PMLA prevails as special enactment over general law. Section 65 allows application of Criminal Procedure Code provisions not inconsistent with PMLA for arrest, investigation, etc. Respondents followed PMLA procedures for arrest, no infirmity found. If person already in judicial custody for one case, can be formally arrested for subsequent case investigation. Section 19(3) PMLA requirements complied with, no violation. Petition dismissed as devoid of merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.