Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Arrest order challenged u/s 19(3) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. Court held PMLA prevails as special enactment over general law. Section 65 allows application of Criminal Procedure Code provisions not inconsistent with PMLA for arrest, investigation, etc. Respondents followed PMLA procedures for arrest, no infirmity found. If person already in judicial custody for one case, can be formally arrested for subsequent case investigation. Section 19(3) PMLA requirements complied with, no violation. Petition dismissed as devoid of merits.
Arrest order challenged u/s 19(3) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. Court held PMLA prevails as special enactment over general law. Section 65 allows application of Criminal Procedure Code provisions not inconsistent with PMLA for arrest, investigation, etc. Respondents followed PMLA procedures for arrest, no infirmity found. If person already in judicial custody for one case, can be formally arrested for subsequent case investigation. Section 19(3) PMLA requirements complied with, no violation. Petition dismissed as devoid of merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.