Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Manufacturer cleared excisable goods to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units. Refund claim filed for accumulated CENVAT credit u/r 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Refund permissible as per CBEC Circular 1001/8/2015-CE dated 28.04.2015. CESTAT in CCE, Faridabad vs. M/s Delton Cables Ltd. held refund rightly allowed for clearances to 100% EOU mega projects. Appellant entitled to refund of accumulated CENVAT credit for clearances to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units u/r 5. Impugned order sanctioning refund restored, appeal allowed.
Manufacturer cleared excisable goods to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units. Refund claim filed for accumulated CENVAT credit u/r 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Refund permissible as per CBEC Circular 1001/8/2015-CE dated 28.04.2015. CESTAT in CCE, Faridabad vs. M/s Delton Cables Ltd. held refund rightly allowed for clearances to 100% EOU mega projects. Appellant entitled to refund of accumulated CENVAT credit for clearances to Mega Power Projects and SEZ units u/r 5. Impugned order sanctioning refund restored, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
