Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The provisions of section 69A allow for additions if the assessee is found to be the owner of unrecorded money, bullion, jewelry, or valuable articles. However, when sales are duly recorded and supported by the books of account, additions cannot be made u/s 69A. The assessee's books were rejected, and profits were estimated at 10% on the money deposited in the bank account. The Assessing Officer made a trading addition without reducing the profit already reflected in the books. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reduce the profit already declared by the assessee at 5.74% and consider the remaining 4.26% as a trading addition. Regarding section 145(3), once the books of account are rejected based on detailed reasons, rejecting the method of accounting and stock valuation is not necessary. The assessee did not challenge the rejection of books, and the tribunal found no infirmity in the findings of the lower authorities.
The provisions of section 69A allow for additions if the assessee is found to be the owner of unrecorded money, bullion, jewelry, or valuable articles. However, when sales are duly recorded and supported by the books of account, additions cannot be made u/s 69A. The assessee's books were rejected, and profits were estimated at 10% on the money deposited in the bank account. The Assessing Officer made a trading addition without reducing the profit already reflected in the books. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reduce the profit already declared by the assessee at 5.74% and consider the remaining 4.26% as a trading addition. Regarding section 145(3), once the books of account are rejected based on detailed reasons, rejecting the method of accounting and stock valuation is not necessary. The assessee did not challenge the rejection of books, and the tribunal found no infirmity in the findings of the lower authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
