Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash balance, and deposits in assessee's books of accounts. Cash sales against issued cash memos and immediate delivery cannot be considered unexplained money. Authorities did not find defects in books or abnormal increase in cash sales/balance before demonetization. Section 115BBE, applicable on income u/ss 68-69D, is inapplicable since source of cash deposits is business income. Assessee discharged initial burden by explaining source as cash sales credited in books, supported by evidence. Onus shifted to department to prove deposits represent undisclosed income, which department failed. Relying on Supreme Court's judgment in CIT vs. Orissa Corporation, ITAT allowed assessee's ground against CIT(A)'s findings.
Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash balance, and deposits in assessee's books of accounts. Cash sales against issued cash memos and immediate delivery cannot be considered unexplained money. Authorities did not find defects in books or abnormal increase in cash sales/balance before demonetization. Section 115BBE, applicable on income u/ss 68-69D, is inapplicable since source of cash deposits is business income. Assessee discharged initial burden by explaining source as cash sales credited in books, supported by evidence. Onus shifted to department to prove deposits represent undisclosed income, which department failed. Relying on Supreme Court's judgment in CIT vs. Orissa Corporation, ITAT allowed assessee's ground against CIT(A)'s findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
