Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Classification dispute over imported goods - whether categorized as freely importable silver jewelry or restricted under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Apex court reiterated writ jurisdiction under Articles 32 and 226 is extraordinary, equitable, and discretionary, requiring petitioner to approach court with clean hands, candid disclosure without concealment. Petitioner made false averments about being a registered partnership firm, misleading the court. Held that petitioner abused legal process, not entitled to extraordinary relief. Petition dismissed for lack of candor and suppression of facts.
Classification dispute over imported goods - whether categorized as freely importable silver jewelry or restricted under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Apex court reiterated writ jurisdiction under Articles 32 and 226 is extraordinary, equitable, and discretionary, requiring petitioner to approach court with clean hands, candid disclosure without concealment. Petitioner made false averments about being a registered partnership firm, misleading the court. Held that petitioner abused legal process, not entitled to extraordinary relief. Petition dismissed for lack of candor and suppression of facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
