Jurisdictional sanction requirements bar reassessment when approval comes from an authority lacking statutory competence under the applicable framewor...
Recorded sales receipts cannot be reassessed as unexplained cash credits, eliminating the basis for consequential alleged commission expenditure addit...
Sufficient cause for delayed income-tax appeals requires bona fide diligence; unsubstantiated counsel illness and assessee inaction defeat condonation...
TNMM Segmentation Limits Transfer-Pricing Adjustments to Associated-Enterprise Transactions and Requires Turnover-Based Comparable Selection for IT Se...
Determination of fair market value of leasehold land as on 01.04.1981 for computing long-term capital gains. The Tribunal, considering the valuation report, valued the leasehold rights at Rs. 800/- per square yard instead of Rs. 1,200/- considered by the valuer. The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in estimating the value at Rs. 800/- per square yard, as the registered valuer had already deducted the capitalized value of lease rent from the total fair market value to arrive at Rs. 57,75,000/- as the valuation after considering the leasehold rights. The Court ruled that Section 55(2)(a)(ii) would not apply, and the cost of acquisition should be determined u/s 48 as on 01.04.1981, considering the leasehold rights. The decision went against the revenue authorities.
Determination of fair market value of leasehold land as on 01.04.1981 for computing long-term capital gains. The Tribunal, considering the valuation report, valued the leasehold rights at Rs. 800/- per square yard instead of Rs. 1,200/- considered by the valuer. The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in estimating the value at Rs. 800/- per square yard, as the registered valuer had already deducted the capitalized value of lease rent from the total fair market value to arrive at Rs. 57,75,000/- as the valuation after considering the leasehold rights. The Court ruled that Section 55(2)(a)(ii) would not apply, and the cost of acquisition should be determined u/s 48 as on 01.04.1981, considering the leasehold rights. The decision went against the revenue authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
