Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: support@taxtmi.com

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
    Reassessment after four-year period invalid if based solely on change of opinion without concealment evidence under s.143(3)
    s.154 valid to correct record error and raise domestic company tax rate from 29% to 30% per Finance Act 2017
    Reassessment under section 147 held void ab initio where AO lacked cogent reasons; DTAA and section 194LD protections upheld
    Appeal upholds deletion of additions under s.68 and s.56(2)(x)(b)(B) after assessee proved loans with documentary evidence
    Appeal allowed; proviso to s.251(1)(a) exceeded-remand confined to s.36(1)(iii) disallowance; delete commercially expedient investments, verify linkag...
    Penalty under s.271D cancelled as s.269SS held inapplicable where advances received from non-owner and later refunded
    Payments to intermediary for collecting foreign college fees are not "royalty" under Income Tax Act, 1961; additions deleted
    Confiscation upheld for SEZ diversion; s.114A CA penalty limited to duty or interest; fresh adjudication under ss.112A/114 CA
    Appeal dismissed; KMP's fraudulent share transactions found to intend to defraud creditors, vitiating deals under Section 66(1)
    PMLA provisional attachment order upheld; appeal dismissed as collateral quashing barred pending prosecution and trial-level evidence
    Election rejected for failing to disclose s.138 conviction in Rule 24-A(1) affidavit; later acquittal not curative
    s.73 KGST adjudication quashed for same period; ex parte orders set aside and matters remanded for fresh hearings
    Initial appeal rejection for missing mandatory pre-deposit upheld; belated appeal time-barred; restore appeal if 25% cash deposit within 30 days
    Ex parte order set aside after email notices landed in junk; matter remitted for fresh consideration under Section 73(9)
    Partial relief: penalty of Rs.6,05,17,933 set aside for failure to apply Sections 74, 75 and improper use of Section 122
    Rule 3 of Brick Kiln (Regulation) Rules, 2017 requires licences for manufacturers and dealers, including brick transporters; seizures upheld
    Appeal dismissed; factual findings upheld that alleged bank liabilities were rightly added due to insufficient evidence of transactions
    Appeal under s.249(4)(a) and s.158BC requires payment/deposit of admitted tax; no implied exception or waiver allowed
    Penalty under s.270A(9) deleted where disallowance stemmed from calculation error in s.54F deduction, not misrepresentation
    De novo transfer pricing verification ordered; LIBOR+200bps for trade receivables, 60-day credit; s.14A deleted, CSR disallowed under s.37(1)

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for : Law : All
Reset Filters
Showing
Records
ExpandCollapse

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for : Law : AllReset Filters
    Case ID :

    Order u/s 19(1) of FEMA imposing penalty for contravention of...

    Penalty under FEMA for company's violations; in-charge liability reversed due to lack of knowledge and due diligence exercised.

    📋
    Contents
    AI Summary
    Note

    Note

    -

    Bookmark

    print

    Print

    FEMASeptember 19, 2024Case LawsAT

    Order u/s 19(1) of FEMA imposing penalty for contravention of Section 42(1) challenged. Transactions carried out in violation of FEMA provisions. Liability of person in-charge and responsible for company's conduct of business. Deeming clause holds in-charge liable, with proviso excluding those without knowledge and exercising due diligence. Appellant claimed not being in-charge of compliances, with safeguards and policy in place. Adjudicating Authority silent on Appellant's role and plea. Appellant proved contravention without knowledge and due diligence exercised. Impugned order set aside by Appellate Tribunal in favor of Appellant.

    Topics

    ActsIncome Tax