Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, holding that the CIT(A) exceeded the remit of the proviso to s.251(1)(a) by directing a de novo reassessment when the default related solely to disallowance under s.36(1)(iii). The Tribunal restrained the remand to the discrete issue of s.36(1)(iii) disallowance: it directed deletion of the disallowance insofar as impugned investments fall within the doctrine of commercial expediency and are consistent with prior treatment, and restored remaining investments to the AO for limited verification confined to linkage with interest-free funds and the validity of the s.36(1)(iii) disallowance.
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, holding that the CIT(A) exceeded the remit of the proviso to s.251(1)(a) by directing a de novo reassessment when the default related solely to disallowance under s.36(1)(iii). The Tribunal restrained the remand to the discrete issue of s.36(1)(iii) disallowance: it directed deletion of the disallowance insofar as impugned investments fall within the doctrine of commercial expediency and are consistent with prior treatment, and restored remaining investments to the AO for limited verification confined to linkage with interest-free funds and the validity of the s.36(1)(iii) disallowance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
