Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The petitioner claimed ineligible input tax credit on purchases from the supplier, Tvl. Bharat Marketing, during 2022-2023. The supplier was alleged to be a non-existent entity engaged in bill trading activities, as per an inspection report received from CBIC during a Special All India Drive targeting fake registrations and beneficiaries of bill trading. Consequently, the petitioner's ITC was blocked on 19.07.2024, and a show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 was issued on 16.08.2024, with the summary uploaded on 21.08.2024. The petitioner approached the HC without responding to the show cause notice, which is a violation of procedural norms and principles of natural justice. The HC dismissed the petition, stating that the appropriate course of action would be for the petitioner to submit a response to the show cause notice before seeking judicial intervention.
The petitioner claimed ineligible input tax credit on purchases from the supplier, Tvl. Bharat Marketing, during 2022-2023. The supplier was alleged to be a non-existent entity engaged in bill trading activities, as per an inspection report received from CBIC during a Special All India Drive targeting fake registrations and beneficiaries of bill trading. Consequently, the petitioner's ITC was blocked on 19.07.2024, and a show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 was issued on 16.08.2024, with the summary uploaded on 21.08.2024. The petitioner approached the HC without responding to the show cause notice, which is a violation of procedural norms and principles of natural justice. The HC dismissed the petition, stating that the appropriate course of action would be for the petitioner to submit a response to the show cause notice before seeking judicial intervention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.