Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Seized goods comprising 14 containers of Used Multifunctional Digital Devices (MFDs) denied provisional release. Tribunal observed numerous orders from itself and High Courts accepted impugned MFDs not liable for absolute confiscation. Relied on Supreme Court judgment in Commissioner of Customs vs. M/s. Atul Automations Pvt. Ltd. dismissing revenue's review petition. Appellant's request for provisional release covered u/s 110A of the Act. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed. Adjudicating authority directed to order provisional release within one month considering matter pending over five years.
Seized goods comprising 14 containers of Used Multifunctional Digital Devices (MFDs) denied provisional release. Tribunal observed numerous orders from itself and High Courts accepted impugned MFDs not liable for absolute confiscation. Relied on Supreme Court judgment in Commissioner of Customs vs. M/s. Atul Automations Pvt. Ltd. dismissing revenue's review petition. Appellant's request for provisional release covered u/s 110A of the Act. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed. Adjudicating authority directed to order provisional release within one month considering matter pending over five years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.