Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The case pertains to the admissibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the 'Rotary Parking System' falling under HSN code 8428 and the blocking of credit u/s 17(5) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017. The appellant renders 'Renting of Immovable Property Service' and proposes to install a 'Rotary Car Parking System' within the premises, not inside the building, to provide parking facilities to tenants and customers. The exclusion clause 'other than plant and machinery' in Section 17(5)(c) and (d) conveys that ITC on 'plant and machinery' is not blocked, but the 'Rotary Parking System' is considered a 'civil structure' excluded from the definition of 'plant and machinery'. The service of 'Renting of Immovable Property' includes common areas and facilities, making the 'Rotary Parking System' part of the immovable property being rented out. Therefore, the input tax credit on the purchase of the 'Rotary Parking System' becomes ineligible u/s 17(5)(d) of the CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, as it amounts to construction of an immovable property.
The case pertains to the admissibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the 'Rotary Parking System' falling under HSN code 8428 and the blocking of credit u/s 17(5) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017. The appellant renders 'Renting of Immovable Property Service' and proposes to install a 'Rotary Car Parking System' within the premises, not inside the building, to provide parking facilities to tenants and customers. The exclusion clause 'other than plant and machinery' in Section 17(5)(c) and (d) conveys that ITC on 'plant and machinery' is not blocked, but the 'Rotary Parking System' is considered a 'civil structure' excluded from the definition of 'plant and machinery'. The service of 'Renting of Immovable Property' includes common areas and facilities, making the 'Rotary Parking System' part of the immovable property being rented out. Therefore, the input tax credit on the purchase of the 'Rotary Parking System' becomes ineligible u/s 17(5)(d) of the CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, as it amounts to construction of an immovable property.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
