Approved gratuity fund provisions remain deductible despite general actual-payment requirements, preventing revision of the allowed gratuity deduction...
Verification of intangible software expenditure and duplicated disallowances requires record-based reassessment before depreciation and income computa...
Cash receipt aggregation requires a single transaction, event or occasion; separate partner capital contributions cannot attract cash-receipt penaltie...
Expenses incurred for professional charges paid to identify...
Healthcare tech firm's expenses for identifying acquisition targets treated as revenue, not capital. No exempt income, so Section 14A disallowance inapplicable.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Expenses incurred for professional charges paid to identify potential acquisition targets in healthcare technology sector deemed revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. Disallowance u/s 14A not applicable if no exempt income received. Appeal by assessee allowed, relying on precedent of On Mobile Global Ltd. case. Genuineness of transactions for services rendered not disputed. Appellate Tribunal's ruling favoring assessee's stance on nature of expenses and inapplicability of Section 14A disallowance.
Expenses incurred for professional charges paid to identify potential acquisition targets in healthcare technology sector deemed revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. Disallowance u/s 14A not applicable if no exempt income received. Appeal by assessee allowed, relying on precedent of On Mobile Global Ltd. case. Genuineness of transactions for services rendered not disputed. Appellate Tribunal's ruling favoring assessee's stance on nature of expenses and inapplicability of Section 14A disallowance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
