Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Petition u/s 227 of Criminal Procedure Code for discharge dismissed. Allegations in complaint constitute offence of money laundering u/s 3 of PMLA. Prosecution of shareholders permissible if evidence links them to commission of crime. Section 3 covers indirect attempts, assistance or involvement in money laundering. Mere concealment, possession or use sufficient for prosecution. Direct link unnecessary, indirect involvement and connecting link suffice. Discharge u/s 227 in PMLA cases differs from general criminal cases. Material evidence against petitioner regarding consent as major shareholder for borrowing, offering collateral security to be proved at trial. Section 70 of PMLA on presumption of culpable mental state to be read with Section 3. Shareholder liability principle under general law inapplicable to PMLA. Petitioner, holding 86% shares, to prove lack of knowledge of money laundering during trial. Complaint contains material evidence for prosecution, petitioner to prove innocence at trial. No infirmity in impugned order, revision dismissed.
Petition u/s 227 of Criminal Procedure Code for discharge dismissed. Allegations in complaint constitute offence of money laundering u/s 3 of PMLA. Prosecution of shareholders permissible if evidence links them to commission of crime. Section 3 covers indirect attempts, assistance or involvement in money laundering. Mere concealment, possession or use sufficient for prosecution. Direct link unnecessary, indirect involvement and connecting link suffice. Discharge u/s 227 in PMLA cases differs from general criminal cases. Material evidence against petitioner regarding consent as major shareholder for borrowing, offering collateral security to be proved at trial. Section 70 of PMLA on presumption of culpable mental state to be read with Section 3. Shareholder liability principle under general law inapplicable to PMLA. Petitioner, holding 86% shares, to prove lack of knowledge of money laundering during trial. Complaint contains material evidence for prosecution, petitioner to prove innocence at trial. No infirmity in impugned order, revision dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
