Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The High Court held that the provisions of Section 144B read with Section 151A, which mandate a faceless assessment mechanism, are applicable to cases involving central charges and international taxation charges. The faceless mechanism applies to proceedings u/ss 148A and 148 of the Income Tax Act, relating to the issuance of notices for reassessment. The Court rejected the revenue's contention that the present case falls outside the applicability of these provisions and the scheme notified by the Central Government on March 29, 2022. The notices issued by the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) were held to be illegal and without jurisdiction as they fell outside the purview of the faceless mechanism. The Court relied on its earlier decisions in Hexaware, CapitalG LP, and Sri Venkataramana Reddy Patloola, which consistently held that central charges and international taxation charges are subject to the faceless assessment mechanism u/ss 144B and 151A, including proceedings u/ss 148A and 148. The decision was in favor of the assessee.
The High Court held that the provisions of Section 144B read with Section 151A, which mandate a faceless assessment mechanism, are applicable to cases involving central charges and international taxation charges. The faceless mechanism applies to proceedings u/ss 148A and 148 of the Income Tax Act, relating to the issuance of notices for reassessment. The Court rejected the revenue's contention that the present case falls outside the applicability of these provisions and the scheme notified by the Central Government on March 29, 2022. The notices issued by the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) were held to be illegal and without jurisdiction as they fell outside the purview of the faceless mechanism. The Court relied on its earlier decisions in Hexaware, CapitalG LP, and Sri Venkataramana Reddy Patloola, which consistently held that central charges and international taxation charges are subject to the faceless assessment mechanism u/ss 144B and 151A, including proceedings u/ss 148A and 148. The decision was in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
