Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The petitioner's Miscellaneous Application was not pending as on 31st January 2020, the specified date for eligibility under the VSV Scheme. However, the Tribunal subsequently recalled its order dismissing the petitioner's appeal filed in 2015, effectively restoring the appeal to a pending status as of 31st January 2020. Consequently, the petitioner qualifies as an appellant eligible to file a declaration u/ss 3 and 4 of the VSV Act on the specified date. The respondent authority's rejection of the petitioner's declaration is untenable and quashed. The authority is directed to consider and process the petitioner's declaration within 12 weeks.
The petitioner's Miscellaneous Application was not pending as on 31st January 2020, the specified date for eligibility under the VSV Scheme. However, the Tribunal subsequently recalled its order dismissing the petitioner's appeal filed in 2015, effectively restoring the appeal to a pending status as of 31st January 2020. Consequently, the petitioner qualifies as an appellant eligible to file a declaration u/ss 3 and 4 of the VSV Act on the specified date. The respondent authority's rejection of the petitioner's declaration is untenable and quashed. The authority is directed to consider and process the petitioner's declaration within 12 weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.