Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee failed to declare Long Term Capital Loss (LTCL) on sale of shares of ECL and Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of shares of Saya in the return of income. ECL and Saya appear to be penny stock companies. Assessee seemingly dealt in shares of these companies but did not reflect profits/losses correctly in the return. Assessing Officer (AO) failed to inquire into this aspect during assessment proceedings. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) erred in directing AO to assess income u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE, binding AO without independent application of mind. Assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue's interest as AO did not examine treatment of LTCL and LTCG. AO directed to carry out de-novo assessment as per law after giving assessee opportunity of hearing. Decided against assessee by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).
Assessee failed to declare Long Term Capital Loss (LTCL) on sale of shares of ECL and Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of shares of Saya in the return of income. ECL and Saya appear to be penny stock companies. Assessee seemingly dealt in shares of these companies but did not reflect profits/losses correctly in the return. Assessing Officer (AO) failed to inquire into this aspect during assessment proceedings. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) erred in directing AO to assess income u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE, binding AO without independent application of mind. Assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue's interest as AO did not examine treatment of LTCL and LTCG. AO directed to carry out de-novo assessment as per law after giving assessee opportunity of hearing. Decided against assessee by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
