Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The appellant company, part of a group, was involved in clandestine removal of imported partially oriented yarn (PFY) into the local market, breaching Notification No. 59 of 1998 for manufacture of export goods. This diversion occurred in connivance with brokers and buyers to obtain cash sale proceeds. Consequently, the demand for customs duties on seized yarns from Jay Krishna Sizers and Carewell Rayons Pvt. Ltd., and the imposition of penalty on the appellant, were upheld. The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law arising from the Tribunal's order.
The appellant company, part of a group, was involved in clandestine removal of imported partially oriented yarn (PFY) into the local market, breaching Notification No. 59 of 1998 for manufacture of export goods. This diversion occurred in connivance with brokers and buyers to obtain cash sale proceeds. Consequently, the demand for customs duties on seized yarns from Jay Krishna Sizers and Carewell Rayons Pvt. Ltd., and the imposition of penalty on the appellant, were upheld. The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law arising from the Tribunal's order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
