Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
This case deals with the classification of supply and taxability under GST for the handover of building, civil structures, and railway siding constructed by the applicant on government land to a new lessee (OMCL). The key points are: 1) The transfer of building without ownership rights in the underlying land does not constitute a 'sale' under GST. 2) The consideration received by the applicant from OMCL for handing over the constructed assets is not merely a monetary transaction but constitutes a supply of service. 3) The applicant's agreement to refrain from removing the constructed assets against consideration from OMCL is treated as a supply of service under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act. 4) This service is classifiable as 'Other Miscellaneous Service' (SAC 999792) and taxable at 18% GST rate.
This case deals with the classification of supply and taxability under GST for the handover of building, civil structures, and railway siding constructed by the applicant on government land to a new lessee (OMCL). The key points are: 1) The transfer of building without ownership rights in the underlying land does not constitute a 'sale' under GST. 2) The consideration received by the applicant from OMCL for handing over the constructed assets is not merely a monetary transaction but constitutes a supply of service. 3) The applicant's agreement to refrain from removing the constructed assets against consideration from OMCL is treated as a supply of service under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act. 4) This service is classifiable as 'Other Miscellaneous Service' (SAC 999792) and taxable at 18% GST rate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
