Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Violation of principles of natural justice by not providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to substantiate their claim. The respondent wrongfully availed input tax credit on the purchase of motor vehicles, reflected in GSTR-2A, and the corresponding GSTR-3B, violating Section 17(5) of the TNGST/CGST Acts. The court held that the respondent's order was passed without giving reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, violating natural justice principles. The petitioner claimed unawareness of the notice issued through the GST Portal and could establish their case if given an opportunity. The petitioner's appeal against the impugned order was dismissed solely on the ground of no provision to condone the delay. Considering the facts and circumstances, the court condoned the delay in filing the appeal by the petitioner before the Appellate Authority in the interest of justice. The petition was disposed of.
Violation of principles of natural justice by not providing sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to substantiate their claim. The respondent wrongfully availed input tax credit on the purchase of motor vehicles, reflected in GSTR-2A, and the corresponding GSTR-3B, violating Section 17(5) of the TNGST/CGST Acts. The court held that the respondent's order was passed without giving reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, violating natural justice principles. The petitioner claimed unawareness of the notice issued through the GST Portal and could establish their case if given an opportunity. The petitioner's appeal against the impugned order was dismissed solely on the ground of no provision to condone the delay. Considering the facts and circumstances, the court condoned the delay in filing the appeal by the petitioner before the Appellate Authority in the interest of justice. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
