Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The High Court held that the right accrued under a law or scheme in favor of a person cannot be denied due to a technical error or glitch. This principle was established in the case of Bombardier Transportation India Pvt Ltd v. Directorate General of Foreign Trade, where benefits under the MEIS Scheme were considered. The court ruled that if substantive conditions are satisfied, the entitled benefit cannot be denied due to a technical error in the electronic system. Consequently, the respondents were directed to grant the RoSCTL Scheme benefits within eight weeks from the order's receipt date, allowing the petition.
The High Court held that the right accrued under a law or scheme in favor of a person cannot be denied due to a technical error or glitch. This principle was established in the case of Bombardier Transportation India Pvt Ltd v. Directorate General of Foreign Trade, where benefits under the MEIS Scheme were considered. The court ruled that if substantive conditions are satisfied, the entitled benefit cannot be denied due to a technical error in the electronic system. Consequently, the respondents were directed to grant the RoSCTL Scheme benefits within eight weeks from the order's receipt date, allowing the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
