Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The High Court held that the right accrued under a law or scheme in favor of a person cannot be denied due to a technical error or glitch. This principle was established in the case of Bombardier Transportation India Pvt Ltd v. Directorate General of Foreign Trade, where benefits under the MEIS Scheme were considered. The court ruled that if substantive conditions are satisfied, the entitled benefit cannot be denied due to a technical error in the electronic system. Consequently, the respondents were directed to grant the RoSCTL Scheme benefits within eight weeks from the order's receipt date, allowing the petition.
The High Court held that the right accrued under a law or scheme in favor of a person cannot be denied due to a technical error or glitch. This principle was established in the case of Bombardier Transportation India Pvt Ltd v. Directorate General of Foreign Trade, where benefits under the MEIS Scheme were considered. The court ruled that if substantive conditions are satisfied, the entitled benefit cannot be denied due to a technical error in the electronic system. Consequently, the respondents were directed to grant the RoSCTL Scheme benefits within eight weeks from the order's receipt date, allowing the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
