Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Petitioner challenged the impugned order alleging violation of principles of natural justice, being unaware of the order and preceding notices, and discrepancy between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B filings. The High Court found the petitioner may have a case on merits, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the case to the respondent for fresh orders on merits and in accordance with law, subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of disputed tax within 30 days. The quashed impugned order shall be treated as an addendum to the preceding show cause notice. The petition was disposed of.
Petitioner challenged the impugned order alleging violation of principles of natural justice, being unaware of the order and preceding notices, and discrepancy between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B filings. The High Court found the petitioner may have a case on merits, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the case to the respondent for fresh orders on merits and in accordance with law, subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of disputed tax within 30 days. The quashed impugned order shall be treated as an addendum to the preceding show cause notice. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
