Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The impugned show cause notice (SCN) was cryptic and lacked specific details of allegations, merely referring to a statutory provision without providing any clue regarding transactions resulting in wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The SCN failed to satisfy the requisite standard, violating principles of natural justice by not enabling the petitioner to respond to allegations. Additionally, no date or time for personal hearing was communicated. The cancellation order was passed retrospectively without providing an opportunity to contest, further violating natural justice. However, considering the petitioner sought cancellation, the cancellation order was made operative prospectively from the SCN date, not retrospectively. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The impugned show cause notice (SCN) was cryptic and lacked specific details of allegations, merely referring to a statutory provision without providing any clue regarding transactions resulting in wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The SCN failed to satisfy the requisite standard, violating principles of natural justice by not enabling the petitioner to respond to allegations. Additionally, no date or time for personal hearing was communicated. The cancellation order was passed retrospectively without providing an opportunity to contest, further violating natural justice. However, considering the petitioner sought cancellation, the cancellation order was made operative prospectively from the SCN date, not retrospectively. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
