Prior APA methodology guides transfer pricing benchmarking where consistent FAR profiles support comparability and arm's length margins eliminate adju...
Battery-integrated tablet rear covers classify as lithium-ion accumulators when protective components enable the battery's active energy-storage funct...
Review petition dismissed for lack of grounds permissible under law. Court found no mistake or error apparent on record to warrant review of the impugned order passed with consent of parties. Petitioner's reliance on Bombay High Court decision misplaced as it dealt with typographical error. Petition devoid of merit, dismissed on contest without costs. Refusal of refund of ITC upheld, with protection granted earlier for filing appeal before GST Tribunal once constituted, subject to deposit of 20% remaining disputed tax amount.
Review petition dismissed for lack of grounds permissible under law. Court found no mistake or error apparent on record to warrant review of the impugned order passed with consent of parties. Petitioner's reliance on Bombay High Court decision misplaced as it dealt with typographical error. Petition devoid of merit, dismissed on contest without costs. Refusal of refund of ITC upheld, with protection granted earlier for filing appeal before GST Tribunal once constituted, subject to deposit of 20% remaining disputed tax amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
