Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Absolute confiscation of counterfeit goods upheld as appellant relinquished title and claimed non-ownership. For other mis-declared goods, transaction value rejected u/r 12, value re-determined through market inquiry u/r 9 after deducting abatements, method accepted by importer. Redemption fine equal to value of goods deemed harsh, reduced. Penalty u/ss 114A and 114AA set aside, penalty under 112(a) reduced to Rs. 9,00,000/-. Partial relief granted in appeal before Appellate Tribunal.
Absolute confiscation of counterfeit goods upheld as appellant relinquished title and claimed non-ownership. For other mis-declared goods, transaction value rejected u/r 12, value re-determined through market inquiry u/r 9 after deducting abatements, method accepted by importer. Redemption fine equal to value of goods deemed harsh, reduced. Penalty u/ss 114A and 114AA set aside, penalty under 112(a) reduced to Rs. 9,00,000/-. Partial relief granted in appeal before Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.