Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner's reply enclosed only GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, and income tax documents, failing to provide all relevant documents to establish that the services fall within the scope of Section 9(3) of the applicable GST enactments read with Notification No.13/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. Despite the petitioner's assertion that the services provided fall within the scope of the above provision and notification, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity by putting the petitioner on terms. The impugned order dated 18.12.2023 is set aside subject to the petitioner remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petition is disposed of.
Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner's reply enclosed only GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, and income tax documents, failing to provide all relevant documents to establish that the services fall within the scope of Section 9(3) of the applicable GST enactments read with Notification No.13/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. Despite the petitioner's assertion that the services provided fall within the scope of the above provision and notification, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity by putting the petitioner on terms. The impugned order dated 18.12.2023 is set aside subject to the petitioner remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
