Human-probability test defeats political donation deduction where banking records mask accommodation-entry fund layering and evidence shows non-genuin...
Commercial property status protects capital-gains exemption when residential-house ownership limits are tested, while agricultural-land character gove...
Investigation deposits refunded after failed customs demands fall outside the statutory appellate pre-deposit interest regime and may attract compensa...
Resolution plan finality extinguishes unquantified operational-creditor claims and pending proceedings unless the approved plan expressly preserves th...
Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner's reply enclosed only GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, and income tax documents, failing to provide all relevant documents to establish that the services fall within the scope of Section 9(3) of the applicable GST enactments read with Notification No.13/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. Despite the petitioner's assertion that the services provided fall within the scope of the above provision and notification, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity by putting the petitioner on terms. The impugned order dated 18.12.2023 is set aside subject to the petitioner remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petition is disposed of.
Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner's reply enclosed only GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, and income tax documents, failing to provide all relevant documents to establish that the services fall within the scope of Section 9(3) of the applicable GST enactments read with Notification No.13/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. Despite the petitioner's assertion that the services provided fall within the scope of the above provision and notification, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity by putting the petitioner on terms. The impugned order dated 18.12.2023 is set aside subject to the petitioner remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
