Capital Asset Conversion Requires Proven Business Stock Treatment; Paper Consideration in Spousal Flat Transfers Does Not Create Taxable Business Inco...
Human-probability test defeats political donation deduction where banking records mask accommodation-entry fund layering and evidence shows non-genuin...
Commercial property status protects capital-gains exemption when residential-house ownership limits are tested, while agricultural-land character gove...
Investigation deposits refunded after failed customs demands fall outside the statutory appellate pre-deposit interest regime and may attract compensa...
Resolution plan finality extinguishes unquantified operational-creditor claims and pending proceedings unless the approved plan expressly preserves th...
Page of 4897
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
661 to 680 of 97921 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The taxpayer filed an original return which was processed by the CPC. Subsequently, a revised return was filed u/s 139(5) with a self-assessment tax of Rs. 10,820/-. However, the taxpayer again paid self-assessment tax not aligned with either the original or revised return. The CPC did not process the revised return, and rectification was disallowed. The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to consider the rectification petition without limitation issues. The AO must verify the returns, compute income correctly, and not dismiss the petition solely on limitation grounds. The assessee must furnish relevant evidence. Tax cannot be collected without legal authority, and the assessee's bona fides were evident due to erroneous tax payment.
The taxpayer filed an original return which was processed by the CPC. Subsequently, a revised return was filed u/s 139(5) with a self-assessment tax of Rs. 10,820/-. However, the taxpayer again paid self-assessment tax not aligned with either the original or revised return. The CPC did not process the revised return, and rectification was disallowed. The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to consider the rectification petition without limitation issues. The AO must verify the returns, compute income correctly, and not dismiss the petition solely on limitation grounds. The assessee must furnish relevant evidence. Tax cannot be collected without legal authority, and the assessee's bona fides were evident due to erroneous tax payment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.