Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing officer (TPO) erred by considering non-associated enterprise (non-AE) revenue and costs while computing transfer pricing (TP) adjustment, contrary to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) directions. TP adjustment should only consider transactions with associated enterprises (AEs), as per transfer pricing regulations and Chapter X of the Income Tax Act. ITAT directed assessing officer (AO)/TPO to rectify by considering only AE transactions for TP adjustment computation, without circumventing ITAT and DRP directions. Assessee's appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Transfer pricing officer (TPO) erred by considering non-associated enterprise (non-AE) revenue and costs while computing transfer pricing (TP) adjustment, contrary to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) directions. TP adjustment should only consider transactions with associated enterprises (AEs), as per transfer pricing regulations and Chapter X of the Income Tax Act. ITAT directed assessing officer (AO)/TPO to rectify by considering only AE transactions for TP adjustment computation, without circumventing ITAT and DRP directions. Assessee's appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
