Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] dismissing the assessee's appeal without admitting it for adjudication on merits. The CIT(A) had rejected the appeal on the ground that the assessee had not satisfied the condition of payment of advance tax as specified u/s 249(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee contended that due to a heart problem and hospitalization for angioplasty, they could not appear on the dates provided by the Assessing Officer. Considering the decisions in similar cases and the totality of facts, the Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to admit the assessee's appeal for adjudication on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] dismissing the assessee's appeal without admitting it for adjudication on merits. The CIT(A) had rejected the appeal on the ground that the assessee had not satisfied the condition of payment of advance tax as specified u/s 249(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee contended that due to a heart problem and hospitalization for angioplasty, they could not appear on the dates provided by the Assessing Officer. Considering the decisions in similar cases and the totality of facts, the Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to admit the assessee's appeal for adjudication on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
