Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CIT(A) erred in rejecting assessee's delay condonation request on technical grounds without considering assessee's absence from India until order receipt date. Assessee filed appeal within 30 days of returning to India, satisfying Section 249(2)(b) requirement. CIT(A) adopted pedantic approach, ignoring sufficient cause. Matter remanded to AO to decide afresh after issuing notice to assessee's updated address and email, allowing submissions. Assessee's lack of opportunity before AO also noted.
CIT(A) erred in rejecting assessee's delay condonation request on technical grounds without considering assessee's absence from India until order receipt date. Assessee filed appeal within 30 days of returning to India, satisfying Section 249(2)(b) requirement. CIT(A) adopted pedantic approach, ignoring sufficient cause. Matter remanded to AO to decide afresh after issuing notice to assessee's updated address and email, allowing submissions. Assessee's lack of opportunity before AO also noted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
