Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Duty refund claimed based on affidavit and certificate was inappropriate. Revenue did not dispute discharge of duty by appellant on revised invoice. Appellant inadvertently paid duty in April 2012 on entire consignment, later issuing fresh invoice for part quantity. Respondent's documentation established bonafides and upheld refund claim. Tribunal ruled department cannot retain duty not payable under law. Once invoice is cancelled, no duty can be demanded unless department proves goods moved under cancelled invoice causing duty loss. No such evidence found. Commissioner's order allowing refund upheld, department's appeal dismissed.
Duty refund claimed based on affidavit and certificate was inappropriate. Revenue did not dispute discharge of duty by appellant on revised invoice. Appellant inadvertently paid duty in April 2012 on entire consignment, later issuing fresh invoice for part quantity. Respondent's documentation established bonafides and upheld refund claim. Tribunal ruled department cannot retain duty not payable under law. Once invoice is cancelled, no duty can be demanded unless department proves goods moved under cancelled invoice causing duty loss. No such evidence found. Commissioner's order allowing refund upheld, department's appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
