Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Challenge to suspension order of State GST officer for issuing refund to a fake exporter without proper verification. Petitioner contests suspension citing lack of strong prima facie evidence and non-application of mind by respondents. High Court notes quasi-judicial nature of refund process, requiring timely processing and balancing exchequer's interest. Compliance with Act and circular sufficient for refund order; suspension warranted only for serious misconduct. Court finds insufficient evidence of moral turpitude or grave misconduct, quashes suspension order. Petition allowed.
Challenge to suspension order of State GST officer for issuing refund to a fake exporter without proper verification. Petitioner contests suspension citing lack of strong prima facie evidence and non-application of mind by respondents. High Court notes quasi-judicial nature of refund process, requiring timely processing and balancing exchequer's interest. Compliance with Act and circular sufficient for refund order; suspension warranted only for serious misconduct. Court finds insufficient evidence of moral turpitude or grave misconduct, quashes suspension order. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
