Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The case involves wrongful availment of cenvat credit on Bills of Entry paid under protest. The Department contended the appellant ineligible due to provisional assessment status. However, the Customs Act allows credit even in provisional assessment. The Tribunal precedent supports credit eligibility. The appellant is deemed eligible. Regarding time limitation, no intent to evade duty payment was found. Department's delayed notice failed to establish grounds for extended period. The appellant's appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside by CESTAT.
The case involves wrongful availment of cenvat credit on Bills of Entry paid under protest. The Department contended the appellant ineligible due to provisional assessment status. However, the Customs Act allows credit even in provisional assessment. The Tribunal precedent supports credit eligibility. The appellant is deemed eligible. Regarding time limitation, no intent to evade duty payment was found. Department's delayed notice failed to establish grounds for extended period. The appellant's appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside by CESTAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
