Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
The case deals with determining the appropriate date for converting an arbitral award expressed in foreign currency to Indian rupees. The court held that the exchange rate on the date of deposit applies, with non-withdrawal being at the discretion of the respondent. The date for converting a subsequent deposit is determined by the completion of proceedings. Statutory provisions dictate that interest ceases once a deposit is made to the court or the decree-holder. The relevant date for conversion is when the award becomes enforceable, after objections are decided. The deposited amount must be adjusted against the remaining principal and interest, converted on the date of enforceability. The ruling was in line with previous Supreme Court decisions.
The case deals with determining the appropriate date for converting an arbitral award expressed in foreign currency to Indian rupees. The court held that the exchange rate on the date of deposit applies, with non-withdrawal being at the discretion of the respondent. The date for converting a subsequent deposit is determined by the completion of proceedings. Statutory provisions dictate that interest ceases once a deposit is made to the court or the decree-holder. The relevant date for conversion is when the award becomes enforceable, after objections are decided. The deposited amount must be adjusted against the remaining principal and interest, converted on the date of enforceability. The ruling was in line with previous Supreme Court decisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
