COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Page of 4915
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 98300 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Contradictory findings by Appellate Authority regarding classification of bio-fertilizers produced by petitioner and another manufacturer under different chapters leading to disparate GST rates of 12% and 5% respectively. Impugned order classifying petitioner's bio-fertilizers under Chapter 3002 quashed and matter remanded to Appellate Authority for fresh consideration after providing opportunity of hearing to petitioner due to anomaly in classification.
Contradictory findings by Appellate Authority regarding classification of bio-fertilizers produced by petitioner and another manufacturer under different chapters leading to disparate GST rates of 12% and 5% respectively. Impugned order classifying petitioner's bio-fertilizers under Chapter 3002 quashed and matter remanded to Appellate Authority for fresh consideration after providing opportunity of hearing to petitioner due to anomaly in classification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.