Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reopening of assessment challenged on grounds that Assessing...
Reopening notice invalid, income already considered in regular assessment. General info insufficient reason. Mechanical sanction, no application of mind.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Reopening of assessment challenged on grounds that Assessing Officer had already considered entries related to Long/Short Term Capital Gains/Losses, Unsecured Loans, Share Premium, Bogus Gains, Contrived Losses during regular assessment. Court held that since AO had considered issue during regular assessment, impugned notice u/s 148 for reopening based on general information received from investigation wing regarding script Kaushal Limited was not valid. Reasons recorded did not disclose particular income escapement. Impugned notice issued without application of mind and sanction granted mechanically. Notice based on information already considered during regular assessment, hence quashed and set aside in favor of assessee.
Reopening of assessment challenged on grounds that Assessing Officer had already considered entries related to Long/Short Term Capital Gains/Losses, Unsecured Loans, Share Premium, Bogus Gains, Contrived Losses during regular assessment. Court held that since AO had considered issue during regular assessment, impugned notice u/s 148 for reopening based on general information received from investigation wing regarding script Kaushal Limited was not valid. Reasons recorded did not disclose particular income escapement. Impugned notice issued without application of mind and sanction granted mechanically. Notice based on information already considered during regular assessment, hence quashed and set aside in favor of assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
